yum -> rpmdb: Locker still has locks

[Paul Dickson]

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:15:39 -0500, Jim Cornette wrote:

> Paul Dickson wrote:
> 
> >>   I misinterpreted the 3/70 and the [...] above. So did it continued through 
> >> to 70/70 after rebuilding the db before the transaction?
> > 
> > Yes it did finish.  I merely included a clipping to show that glibc was
> > no longer installed, at least according to yum/rpm.
> > 
> > 	-Paul
> > 
> 
> Do you have the entry currently inserted into the rpm database for 
> glibc? If it is now in the rpm database, does glibc check out as being 
> intact?
> At least it was not removed in actuality.

"rpm -V glibc glic-common" doesn't report any problems.

Yesterday, yum installed bin-utils because of dependencies.  I now wish
I'd done a rpm -V before I pressed Y, but more than likely, it just
wasn't in the rpm DB any more.

	-Paul