gdesklets included?
Martin Sourada
martin.sourada at seznam.cz
Wed Apr 4 21:06:59 UTC 2007
I don't understand very much to the legal issues concerning mp3 and don't mind
it is not in Fedora by default. But I wonder, since lame mp3 implementation [1]
is licensed under LGPL, are there any other licensing/legal/other issues
blocking such an implementation?
Thanks,
Martin
References
[1] http://lame.sourceforge.net/index.php
Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
> Brian C. Huffman wrote:
>> Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:39:50 Brian C. Huffman wrote:
>>>> 2) I also see in the Release Notes that native mp3 support will be
>>>> included. Will that also be provided?
>>> No.
>>
>> This probably isn't a fair question since I haven't done my research,
>> but is it for the same reason as before. I found this tidbit: "Fedora
>> won't ship MP3-capable software because the Fraunhofer
>> Institute's patent license terms are not compatible with the GPL."
>>
>> However, now that Fluendo is providing mp3 decoding for free, is this
>> still the case?
>
> Yes. It is. See http://www.fluendo.com/resources/fluendo_mp3.php
>
> Rahul
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20070404/ede0d4ab/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list