gtkhtml38 erased on last yum update

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:36:26 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Michael Schwendt said: 
> > > Essentially, you're saying that any package which requires a versioned
> > > API should, rather than having a build requirement on the package,
> > > should have a build *file* requirement on either one of the include
> > > files, or the pkg-config file. Because, well, the package that provides
> > > it might have a name change.
> > > 
> > > Is that *seriously* what you're suggesting?
> > 
> > Where do you see such a suggestion?
> 
> It's the logical conclusion.

And the conclusion is false, because I've not suggested anything
as a replacement for the Provides or BuildRequires.

I've told you what doesn't work anymore nowadays. We've had gpgme03
"Provides: gpgme = 0.3.something", too, and a similar thing in other
packages in the past, until rpm broke it.

Btw, from your gnucash spec:

  # for gtkhtml3-devel
  BuildRequires: /usr/include/libgtkhtml-3.8/gtkhtml/gtkhtml.h

A change on "Tue Mar 13 2007".

> But, eh. rpm broken, film at 11.
> 
> Bill

Right. I'm innocent. ;)