Hal daemon is not started at boot time

[Jim Cornette]

Antonio M wrote:
>>
> Jim
> 
> Of course selinux errors have to be evaluated, I checked in bugzilla
> but I didn't find anything matching these kind of errors. Shall we
> file a new bug???

A report might be a good idea. The SELinux errors I submitted were fixed 
fairly quickly. I have a few more errors to evaluate with SELinux 
regarding gdm-session-worker and (local_login_t)for search and for link.

> 
> I meant that I can run my Pc with full capacity with Selinux=permissive.....
> 

Sorry ... I knew what you meant. I just think running without SELinux is 
too dangerous since some denials it showed in the browser looked like 
intrusion attempts, which it prevented. The errors went away in a short 
time. A little paranoid but the added security protection is what I 
prefer to run at. I set SELinux back to active once gdm and hal start 
successfully (or sufficiently in reality).
Jim

-- 
You've always made the mistake of being yourself.
		-- Eugene Ionesco