Fedora updates-testing report
Luke Macken
lmacken at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 16:30:32 UTC 2007
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:18:36AM -0800, Andrew Farris wrote:
> Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:22:22PM -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> >> Nice! I like the format where you get the "headline news" list of all the
> >> packages updated at the top. Thanks for doing that!
> >
> > Can the report be sorted alphabetically by package name? That would
> > make it easier to scan the list to find something you are looking for.
>
> I thought of asking for that as well, but the overall listing of the package
> updates seems to be in order by when its built? The listing at the top is in
> the same ordering, so it does make it a bit easier to find the details of the
> package in question right now... we'd need both sections to get ordered the
> same. I'd rather have the front listing out of order if the detailed listing
> cannot match it.
>
> And if we did get some reordering, then perhaps getting a broad sort on fc7 and
> fc8 first would be possible, then alphabetical inside that? :)
>
> And another note. By moving to the 'digest format' for these updates we've lost
> the [Security] subject line notation that made it easier to spot those updates
> as a bit more crucial to test and report on asap.
I'm definitely willing to try and make everyones suggested changes, but I ask
that you guys please make note of them in this ticket:
https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi/ticket/152
The SHA1SUMs will be going away pretty soon, which should clean up the
notifications a bit. I'm extremely busy at the moment, but if you add
your suggestions or patches to the above ticket and I'll try and get to
them as soon as I can.
Thanks,
luke
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list