Fighting the i386 plague
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jan 22 23:11:55 UTC 2007
On Monday 22 January 2007 17:44, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> No, I've been trying to get rid of i386 stuff, remember? I checked that
> before posting my first message. Only the x86_64 version was installed.
So that may be one distinct bug.
> I think the situation is a little more complicated, anyway. If I say:
>
> yum install frobnitz
I call bs.
$ rpm -q tcl
package tcl is not installed
[jkeating at reducto comps]$ sudo yum install tcl
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
development 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
extras-development 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for tcl to pack into transaction set.
tcl-8.4.13-3.fc6.x86_64.r 100% |=========================| 26 kB 00:00
---> Package tcl.x86_64 0:8.4.13-3.fc6 set to be updated
---> Package tcl.i386 0:8.4.13-3.fc6 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
tcl x86_64 8.4.13-3.fc6 development 960 k
tcl i386 8.4.13-3.fc6 development 961 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 2 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 1.9 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n
Exiting on user Command
Complete!
>
> It does *not* go off and install both versions - I just get the x86_64
> version, which is what I would want.
This is only true if you have an exclude line that tells yum to not look at
*.i?86 packages. _OR_ the 'frobitz' you're asking to install isn't available
for multilib. Not every package is.
> The i386 packages seem to mostly
> sneak in through upgrades, as was shown in my example.
Again, we may be talking about a distinct bug here.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20070122/df634991/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list