Xen patched kernel packages

[2004 ruffneck]

31.07.07, 17:38, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com>:

First of all, thank you for quick answer!

> We separated the Xen kernel from the bare metal kernel because porting
> Xen from the ancient XenSource delivered kernelss to current LKML state 
> of the art was taking too much time. Xen porting was delaying updates 
> of bare metal kernels to an unacceptable degree.


Ok, I got it.

> As for Xen being merged upstream, while we welcome it, it is of no use to
> Fedora at this time because it is far from feature complete, nor does it
> have the architecture coverage we need
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2007-July/msg00106.html
> Regards,
> Dan.

Daniel, please, correct me if I'm wrong. In linux-2.6.23 merged only DomU part of Xen,  am I right? If I am, that it is really useless at this time.