FC7 XEN 32 bit version.
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jun 4 15:48:10 UTC 2007
On Monday 04 June 2007 11:44:40 Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Honestly you should be thrilled if any Xen stuff work. Xen is still not
> > upstream and they are stuck on an older kernel at the Xen upstream. What
> > we
>
> What makes anyone think Xen ever will get upstream before KVM kills it off
> and lguest replaces it for paravirt ?
I don't. But I'm not really close to the kernel workings to know how much of
a chance it has, or close enough to Xensource to know if they even want it to
be upstream.
> > have in fedora is a best effort forward port done as fast as it can, but
> > the fact that it works at all in any configuration is pretty impressive
> > to me.
>
> Indeed but like utrace you have to ask why its in a distribution that is
> supposed to be tracking upstream ?
I ask myself that a lot...
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20070604/f157d4a9/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list