Policy or best practice on mentioning dependency issues
Dan Carruthers
dcarruth2 at verizon.net
Fri Oct 19 00:11:35 UTC 2007
Arch Willingham wrote:
> In my case, I guess I am "crying" (?) for two reasons:
>
>
> 1. With yumex you have to start it, wait for it to come up, pick
> select, tell it it ok, wait for it to finish, tell it to
> close.....lost of hand holding. On the other hand, with a yum
> command line (shell script), you click one command and walk away.
> 2. Sometimes, you can't tell which one is the problem with yumex.
> It bombs out and says there is a problem with x dependency in y
> package. When you review he list, none of the updatable packages
> contain anything obvious to clue you in to which package to
> exclude. I had one happen that way the other night. I had to end
> up opening yumex, selecting five packages, telling it to apply
> them. If they ran...great...if not figure out which of those
> five were causing the problem.
>
> Arch
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com]*On Behalf Of *Dan
> Carruthers
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2007 7:11 PM
> *To:* For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> *Subject:* Re: Policy or best practice on mentioning dependency issues
>
> seth vidal wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 17:29 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
>>
>>> hmm, what if instead of exiting, yum would ask: "do you wanna continue
>>> with the broken deps packages excluded?" or similar?
>>>
>>
>>
>> what would you want yum to do if you ran it with -y?
>>
>> -sv
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I see all these people crying about broken deps packages in yum,
> so why not run yumex than when you have a broken dep just uncheck
> that package and go ahead with the install.
>
Seems that when I have a dependency error a message box pops up and I
take the time to read it to determine the error than just correct it and
rerun.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20071018/227cc207/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list