F9-Beta install from local harddisk - broken?

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 21:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> What you call "trying to use F8's grub to load F9" is simple file-based
> chainloading in the GRUB shell. There's nothing forbidden in there,
> it's just that F8 GRUB doesn't understand F9's fs structure.
> 
> 
> It's likely that in the near future, I'll be nice again. Today, no
> new bug #s, because I've had enough bugzilla triage spam for stuff
> nobody cared to look at. 
> 
> 
> But I plan to clone #440343 because it also affects F9 and has a
> high probability that it will still be open next year.

Ah, the "My pet bug(s) didn't get looked at, so I'm giving up" syndrome.
I hope somebody else runs into your problem and files the bug so that
the maintainer and/or upstream realize that there is a problem and work
out a fix.

As for 440343 that smells quite a lot like an upstream KDE bug, not a
kernel bug.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080404/d6ef4a24/attachment.sig>