rawhide report: 20080205 changes

[Antonio Olivares]

--- Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:13:06 -0800
> Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Farris wrote:
> > > that it in fact is not a dependency problem, but
> rather a conflict, 
> > > which may not ever be reported in the broken
> dependencies list...  
> > 
> > that was meant to say: since it actually is a
> conflict, not
> > dependency..
> 
> That is, in fact the correct answer.  Conflicts
> aren't checked, as they
> have some odd meanings, particularly in multilib
> environments.
> 
> -- 
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
> > -- 
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: 
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

Thanks for the explanation(s).  These are problems
encountered in testing.  

Regards,

Antonio 


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ