how badly does encrypting the root file system crush my performance?
Alan
alan at clueserver.org
Mon Feb 25 18:41:34 UTC 2008
> On 2/25/08, Alan <alan at clueserver.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i
>> > installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only
>> > one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was
>> > encrypted or not.
>> >
>> > within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the
>> > unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference
>> with
>> > regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference
>> > but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable.
>>
>> That sounds like an artifact of virtualbox. I am using full disk
>> encryption on F9 alpha and I am seeing little, if any, slowdown. Maybe
>> 64-bit helps.
>
> Same here, on i686.
As a side note, I have run VMWare with and without the hardware
virtualization. It DOES make a difference. I do not know if VirtualBox
uses the hardware virtualization. If it does not, it should.
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list