rawhide report: 20080205 changes
Antonio Olivares
olivares14031 at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 6 16:09:56 UTC 2008
--- Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:13:06 -0800
> Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Farris wrote:
> > > that it in fact is not a dependency problem, but
> rather a conflict,
> > > which may not ever be reported in the broken
> dependencies list...
> >
> > that was meant to say: since it actually is a
> conflict, not
> > dependency..
>
> That is, in fact the correct answer. Conflicts
> aren't checked, as they
> have some odd meanings, particularly in multilib
> environments.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
> > --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Thanks for the explanation(s). These are problems
encountered in testing.
Regards,
Antonio
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list