X.org server 1.5: An ABI Too Far?
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 20:56:24 UTC 2008
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 13:30 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
> Their official position
> has been stated at nvnews.net that they intend to wait for the official release
> of xorg 7.4. I think the unstable ABI is being used as an excuse not to get the
> driver done. It will look bad on both their part and on Fedora's part *again*
> if a Fedora release goes out on which the nvidia proprietary driver cannot be
> used. I don't think it is something that is Fedora's problem though.
Last time we (not really, but you know what I mean) hosed ATI. Now it's
nVidia's turn. Consider it proof of failure of the "Proprietary Driver
Model".
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080316/89f22897/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list