superuser console?
David Boles
dgboles at gmail.com
Thu May 1 23:33:06 UTC 2008
John Summerfield wrote:
> Alain PORTAL wrote:
>> Le jeudi 01 mai 2008, Rex Dieter a �crit :
>>> Alain PORTAL wrote:
>>>> Is it a KDE or a Fedora non-feature?
>>> KDE (ie, we haven't done anything to affect this anyway).
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> And nobody complaint about that????
>>
>> Every body is happy with that behaviour?
>
> I've been using KDE since 1.x or so. On f9 I use Gnome.
>
>>
>> Nobody needs dayly a console with fully superuser permissions when he
>> works as a normal user?
>
> I set up and use sudo, so the lack of root console wouldn't affect me,
> even if I continued using KDE.
>
>>
>> As an example, every time I need to know a status service, I need to
>> "/sbin/service" instead of "service"?
>
> Configure $PATH in .bashrc or .bash_profile
>>
>> For me, this really a regression about a Linux Distribution can offer me.
>>
>> Should I have to build my Linux from scratch to get an old behaviour?
>
> Be our guest:-)
>
> Might be easier to switch to Debian, Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. If you want to
> build your own, try gentoo.
8-)
I have always loved that threat. 'If you don't do what I want I will leave for
a different distro!!' I will no longer accept what you provide me for free!! I
will go elsewhere!! And accept what they provide for free!!'
When you think about it, really think about it, it rings kinda' like an empty
threat does it not? ;-)
--
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080501/20595314/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list