Selinux .vs. Apache

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 21:08:12 UTC 2008


On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:02 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> When I install a new version of Fedora I leave Selinux on until
> it prevents me from doing something important. 
> 
> This time Selinux caused Apache to fail reading its configuration
> file where I specified the document root.  Once again, as always,
> off with Selinux.
> 
> I don't know if Linux really needs Selinux.  If it does, it
> needs something that doesn't get in the way of normal
> system functions.

It doesn't get in the way of normal system functions if you put files in
their normal system locations.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20081129/e6bc995f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list