EPEL or Fedora product?

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 22:08 -0500, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> On 10/18/08, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 19:38 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Working on some bug triage... should bugs like this be open against
> >> "Fedora EPEL" instead of "Fedora" since it is a "do this for EPEL" type
> >> bug... not Fedora?
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454918
> >
> > It's not *against* EPEL, so I'm inclined to say no.
> 
> Are you sure that's what you want to say about this?

After reviewing the bug and looking in the repo I see that this is not a
"please build X in EPEL" bug, so I'm sure that that's not what I want to
say about this.

Disregard my original statement.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20081018/33227ecb/attachment.sig>