Help me triage

John Poelstra poelstra at redhat.com
Tue Sep 23 23:30:15 UTC 2008


Hi,

I'm trying to meet a (probably overly aggressive) personal goal of 
having zero NEW rawhide bugs (which are not Package Reviews) by the time 
of Fedora 10 GA.  Along the way I thought I'd post some of the questions 
and issues I see while triaging these bugs so we can all learn.  I 
encourage others to do the same.  I've just knocked the list down to 
close to 500!

If you want to join in and help the query for NEW rawhide bugs excluding 
package reviews is here: http://tinyurl.com/6llac8

Here is what I have so far:

# Is there a general policy around using perl in pre/post ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462996

# Should this be considered a blocker?  Do we have any requirements 
about being able to build all packages from source before GA?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462971

# Is this bug filed against the right component?  What else could I 
request to help troubleshoot this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463044

# what kind of debug information to advise?
# Should pulse audio really have these kind of problems due to removing 
libfalshsupport?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463108

# does anyone have a labeled USB disk handy that could try this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463106

# How should we be triaging "branch" and other CVS type requests ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463397
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463139

# This CVS request has comment saying "it is done".  Can bug be closed 
or where can I check to help verify and then close bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463124
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175

# sounds like an F10Blocker, but I'm not familiar with what PackageKit 
should or should not do or what it used to do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463566

# Should we exclude the component "fedora-packager" from our queries of 
bugs to triage?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463397

# is this critical enough to be a blocker?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463054
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463048
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463047

# This bug is assigned to a defunct email address... how will this bug 
be addressed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462671




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list