does alpine not reply to the Cc list anymore?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Christopher Beland wrote:

> The headers you copied in the below example look like they are
> abridged. Not all headers are necessarily displayed by your mail
> client unless you configure it to do so.  You should be seeing a
> long list of "Received:" headers, among others, possibly including a
> "Reply-to:".  It would be useful to add an example to the bug you
> filed including full headers.

  i expanded the headers and it didn't tell me anything new.  i
configured alpine to include message headers in the reply and here's a
sample reply:


To      : Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>
Cc      : Mike Hinz <mike.hinz at yr20.com>
Attchmnt:
Subject : RE: [fedora-virt] how can i verify that HW extensions are being used?
----- Message Text -----
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Mark McLoughlin wrote:

> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:48:38 +0100
> From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com>
> To: Mike Hinz <mike.hinz at yr20.com>
> Cc: 'Fedora Virtualization Mailing List' <fedora-virt at redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [fedora-virt] how can i verify that HW extensions are being used?
>
> Hi Mike,
...



  so you can see that the original posting was from mark, to mike and
CCed to the list.  the reply -- even when i told it to reply to
*everyone* -- did not include the mailing list in the collection of
recipients.  i don't see how this can be a "feature".  and i don't
recall this behaviour in earlier versions of alpine.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================