qa feature pages

[James Laska]

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:47 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> James Laska said the following on 04/17/2009 10:22 AM Pacific Time:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:56 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> What is the plan for these pages?
> >>
> >> It may look a little funny to be pointing to some of these pages at GA 
> >> if they are "still needing QA approval".
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Features_needing_QA_approval
> > 
> > This started as a way to manage QA review of Fedora features.  However,
> > I don't believe we've made a lot of progress during this release.  
> > 
> > I'm inclined to batch move these to approved at this point.  Perhaps
> > something to revisit for F12 (or beyond) ... feature triage.
> > 
> > Any objections/concerns?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > James
> > 
> 
> Or just drop the category if the process changed or wasn't used?

Thanks, I've gone ahead with that approach.  Hopefully we can revisit QA
engagement in the feature process at a later date.

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090417/97d8930f/attachment.sig>