wifi broken: D-Link wl54 usb
Rob Healey
robhealey1 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 06:24:30 UTC 2009
Greetings:
Whenever I update beta Live CD, Snapshot 1 Live CD, or fc10 to full update,
I lose my wifi...
Packages are:
1) kernel-2.6.29.1-70
2) NetworkManager*-0.7.1
3) zd1211-firmware-1.4-2
It was working when kernel-2.6.29.1-56 was installed. Can anybody help me
or tell me what to do to possible fix it? My real e-mail address is:
robhealey1 at gmail.com
Sincerely,
Rob
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:05 PM, <fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com>wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-test-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: video playback issues with kdenlive on Fedora 11 beta
> (Christopher Beland)
> 2. grub splash image busted? (Tom Horsley)
> 3. Re: network question (Kevin Kofler)
> 4. Re: grub splash image busted? (Kevin Kofler)
> 5. Re: grub splash image busted? (Robert L Cochran)
> 6. Flash on Rawhide (Brian Vuyk)
> 7. Re:Smolt question (Arne Chr. Jorgensen)
> 8. Re: grub splash image busted? (Tom Horsley)
> 9. Re: grub splash image busted? (Greg)
> 10. Wifi (Arne Chr. Jorgensen)
> 11. Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64
> (Antonio Olivares)
> 12. Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 (Greg)
> 13. Re: Re: Fedora-10 nightmare-5 (Leslie)
> 14. About Workspace (Angel Fish)
> 15. Audio in virtual machines (Jason)
> 16. Add/Remove Software no progress display
> (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:52:18 -0400
> From: Christopher Beland <beland at alum.mit.edu>
> Subject: Re: video playback issues with kdenlive on Fedora 11 beta
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1240015938.2589.40.camel at diet-anarchy.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> You may want to file a report at bugzilla.redhat.com, lest the details
> get lost in the traffic of the mailing list.
>
> -B.
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:28 +0100, Andrew Smith wrote:
> > On 16/04/09 23:07, Andrew Smith wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I'm currently testing Fedora 11 beta x86_64.
> > >
> > > I'm specifically testing kdenlive (non-linear video editor) before
> > > Fedora 11 is released.
> > >
> > > The first install went great, with kdenlive absolutely stable and the
> > > whole system extremely fast on ext4 (I'm amazed how much faster
> > > everything is to be honest!)
> > >
> > > All was good for a day or two and then I did a full yum update to the
> > > system.
> > >
> > > On the next start up of kdenlive any attempt to render any video plays
> > > for a second or two and then freezes.
> > > I have directly tested inigo and ffplay and both also freeze up.
> > >
> > > If I play back the same video file with vlc it plays perfectly.
> > >
> > > I do not know what specific package versions I was on but I do recall
> > > seeing qt being upgraded in the yum update.
> > > Also some xorg and x11 packages.
> > >
> > > The rest of the GUI in kdenlive is still responsive, so it looks like
> > > it's just the render thread that's frozen.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > After a bit of testing I've found the problem:
> >
> > kernel-2.6.29.1-70.fc11.x86_64 = video freezes up after a few seconds
> >
> > kernel-2.6.29.1-68.fc11.x86_64 = OK
> > kernel-2.6.29-0.258.2.3.rc8.git2.fc11.x86_64 = OK
> >
> > Therefore the solution is just to change grub.conf to boot off
> > kernel-2.6.29.1-68.fc11.x86_64 for now.
> >
> > So far running Fedora 11 beta using ext4 is lightning fast and stable -
> > thanks to all the developers it's look great!
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:46:44 -0400
> From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley at att.net>
> Subject: grub splash image busted?
> To: fedora-test-list <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20090417214644.2ecc5bb0 at zooty>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up
> looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when
> grub tries to display it :-).
>
> I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or
> some number around there), this image has 255 colors according
> to identify (ImageMagick command).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:47:30 +0200
> From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at>
> Subject: Re: network question
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <gsbbfi$der$1 at ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote:
> > Received from HP: Virus Threat Conficker
> >
> > Does this virus affect Linux ?
>
> No.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:50:18 +0200
> From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at>
> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted?
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <gsbbkq$der$2 at ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up
> > looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when
> > grub tries to display it :-).
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:57:32 -0400
> From: Robert L Cochran <cochranb at speakeasy.net>
> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted?
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49E9338C.4010706 at speakeasy.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Yep, it looks like a rainbow colored puddle of some substance or other.
>
> Bob
>
>
> On 04/17/2009 09:46 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up
> > looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when
> > grub tries to display it :-).
> >
> > I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or
> > some number around there), this image has 255 colors according
> > to identify (ImageMagick command).
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:00:51 -0400
> From: Brian Vuyk <brian at brianvuyk.com>
> Subject: Flash on Rawhide
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49E93453.7050807 at brianvuyk.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I've been having some minor issues with the proprietary Flash on Rawhide
> (32-bit).
>
> It seems that whenever I make a flash file fullscreen, Firefox crashes.
> When running it through GDB, I get the following printed out just prior
> to the backtrace starting:
>
> *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/firefox-3.1b3/firefox: free(): invalid
> pointer: 0xa4958b00 ***
>
> Is this possibly related to the recent malloc changes in glibc?
>
> I would like to get a sense of how many people are experiencing the same
> crash. From conversation with others in #fedora-qa, it seems to be
> pretty widespread. It can be easily tested by visiting any video site
> (youtube, megavideo etc.), opening a video, and clicking the 'enlarge'
> or 'fullscreen' button.
>
> I should note that I used this same version of Flash (10.0.22.87) with
> no fulllscreen issues on Ubuntu prior to beginning to test Rawhide.
>
> There is an existing bug in bugzilla about it, to which I've added my
> information. However, it doesn't seem to be drawing a lot of attention,
> and I think this is a fairly important bug to be quashed, since so many
> people use the proprietary flash.
>
> Here is the bugzilla link:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477110
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <achrisjo at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re:Smolt question
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <584420.16638.qm at web63707.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Jerry Amundson wrote:
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:37:04 -0500
> > From: Jerry Amundson <jamundso at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Smolt question
> > To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> > <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> > Message-ID:
> > <6d06ce20904171237r5e659f1an898dc5321576d6fe at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Arne Chr. Jorgensen
> > > <achrisjo at yahoo.com> > wrote:
> > >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > Some has asked about my hardware, and I thought I could use smolt.
> > > Opening in Gnome, the UUID is ...shoot, have to copy it by hand:
> > >
> > > UUID 35a83161-913c-412f-91a8-e64bbd096c42
> > >
> > > If I try "My Smolt Page" - firefox is loading forever, and I can not
> > > access it.
> > >
> > > I just wondered if any of you could try the number above. Someone here
> > > included their hardware in a link, which worked. I don't know why I am
> > > not able to do that.
> >
> > smoltSendProfile --help
> > for example
> > smoltSendProfile -a
> >
> > will show the url when it complete.
> >
> > jerry
>
> Thank you:
>
> Did "smoltSendProfile -a
>
> Using the information on the bottom, gave
> " Error: Critical: New versions of smolt use a public UUID. Yours is:
> pub_165cffbb-6c02-46d3-84e5-f81db90bcd53"
>
> Using this new number, gave a page. If this is accessable by others,
> I have no idea. Perhaps some admin settings would be needed.
>
> Using the admin password given, gave another "Error: Critical...." but I
> don't have any other then the one supplied.
>
> The graphical smolt-app is clearly failty.
>
> //ARNE
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:12:04 -0400
> From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley at att.net>
> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted?
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20090417221204.345be888 at zooty>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:50:18 +0200
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202
>
> That's the trouble with closing bugs as soon as they are fixed,
> you don't find them when you search open bugs :-).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:22:10 +1000
> From: Greg <Samba30i at aim.com>
> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted?
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49E93952.6060101 at aim.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 18/04/2009 11:57 AM, Robert L Cochran wrote:
> > Yep, it looks like a rainbow colored puddle of some substance or other.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> > On 04/17/2009 09:46 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >> The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up
> >> looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when
> >> grub tries to display it :-).
> >>
> >> I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or
> >> some number around there), this image has 255 colors according
> >> to identify (ImageMagick command).
> >>
> >
> > --
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> i believe the fix is in koji now *fedora-logos*
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=98376 .im sure
> thats the fix thats needed which should be pushed to rawhide soon i
> would assume
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <achrisjo at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Wifi
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <562922.73174.qm at web63702.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> hi,
>
> The last composed email was done with CPU-scaling 800 MHz, cable connected,
> and this time "send" did work. It is behaving differently then on Wifi.
>
> Closing a tab in Firefox, froze up the computer. Tried everything to kill
> the application. ( sure would like a kill-application as under TWM ! )
> Nothing worked, accept power off button.
>
> But this scaling issue looks like nonsense: - it should behave like a
> similar
> cpu with lower crystal frequency. It should not depend on application you
> are running.
>
> Either my understanding is wrong, or here are some serious faults.
>
> Some of the sticky response, stealing of mouse, is back when running on
> cable.
>
> ( I need to recheck it at 2GHz, just to tired of all the problems for one
> day )
>
> //ARNE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64
> To: Nathan Huang <nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com>
> Cc: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <7242.83651.qm at web52603.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Nathan Huang <nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Nathan Huang <nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com>
> > Subject: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64
> > To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> > Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 7:48 PM
> > Hi guys
> > I met a serious problem with installing adobe flashplayer
> > in 86_64 fedora 10. I find adobe company just provide the
> > flashplayer for i386. is there some flashplayer can be
> > supported by 86_64?
> > thanks in advance
> > nathan
> >
> > -- fedora-list mailing list
>
> Nathan,
>
> Mike summed it up very nicely
>
> <quote>
>
> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
>
> You don't have to install or remove anything at all except the above
> package.
>
> 1 - Just download it from above (as that should be the most updated one,
> and yes it's beta, not official release yet).
>
> 2 - untar the package above from the location it's in.
>
> 3 - copy the extracted .so file to /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ dir.
>
> 4 - Start firefox and your all set.
>
> --
> Mike Chambers
> Madisonville, KY
>
> Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, User, etc..
> miketc302 at fedoraproject.org
> </quote>
>
> He was replying to the thread:
>
>
> http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706
>
> HTH,
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:22:50 +1000
> From: Greg <Samba30i at aim.com>
> Subject: Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64
> To: olivares14031 at yahoo.com, For testers of Fedora Core development
> releases <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Cc: Nathan Huang <nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <49E9478A.6080605 at aim.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On 18/04/2009 12:55 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Nathan Huang<nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > From: Nathan Huang<nathan.vorbei.tech at gmail.com>
> >> > Subject: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64
> >> > To:fedora-list at redhat.com <To%3Afedora-list at redhat.com>
> >> > Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 7:48 PM
> >> > Hi guys
> >> > I met a serious problem with installing adobe flashplayer
> >> > in 86_64 fedora 10. I find adobe company just provide the
> >> > flashplayer for i386. is there some flashplayer can be
> >> > supported by 86_64?
> >> > thanks in advance
> >> > nathan
> >> >
> >> > -- fedora-list mailing list
> >>
> > Nathan,
> >
> > Mike summed it up very nicely
> >
> > <quote>
> >
> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
> >
> > You don't have to install or remove anything at all except the above
> > package.
> >
> > 1 - Just download it from above (as that should be the most updated one,
> > and yes it's beta, not official release yet).
> >
> > 2 - untar the package above from the location it's in.
> >
> > 3 - copy the extracted .so file to/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ dir.
> >
> > 4 - Start firefox and your all set.
> >
> > -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester,
> > User, etc.. miketc302 at fedoraproject.org </quote> He was replying to
> > the thread:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706
> > HTH, Antonio
> _leigh123 at linux_ within the fedoraforum has made a RPM which is in his
> thread
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642&highlight=64bit+flash
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/89d8c28a/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:39:26 -0400
> From: Leslie <leslie.satenstein at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Re: Fedora-10 nightmare-5
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49E94B6E.4060108 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 12:10 +0200, François Cami wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
> >> "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <achrisjo at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I would be very pleased
> >>> in anyone would bother to mention the issue to Xorg, and such, as it is
> >>> I think it clear where the error may be located. I have worked around
> >>> the clock, and it is such a painstaking thing to just write anything at
> >>> all on this machine on the momenent. I would appreachiate if some
> passed
> >>> this to those that could be able to look into the code.
> >>>
> >> Arne,
> >>
> >> I realize you're on F10, but the workarounds (nomodeset in the kernel
> >> command line, and switching to XAA in xorg.conf) mentioned in the
> rawhide
> >> bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495454 may help you.
> >>
> >> Alternatively, I would suggest trying F11 as soon as Preview is out and
> >> reporting any bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ .
> >>
> >
> > And to isolate whether the issue actually is the X driver, you could try
> > using the vesa driver instead (or even radeonhd, if the hardware is new
> > enough to work with it). Just to test.
> >
> I cant understand the problem. I have a hdradeon 3450 (256meg) card, and
> everything works just fine at higher resolutions above 1024x768. I have
> not tested lower resolutions, but expect that there may be some problems
> at the 800x600 level. (Just surmising). My driver is fglrx (vendor
> supplied)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:05:59 -0400
> From: Angel Fish <dolphinysj at gmail.com>
> Subject: About Workspace
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <fc260d630904172105v346c1091pcc836f93ddc89e0b at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello everyone,
> When I opening the firefox in Workspace1, then turn to Workspace2 and open
> the Terminal. While the Terminal is opening, turn back to Workspace1. As a
> result, Terminal is opened in Workspace1 only. It's the first time I use
> Fedora 10(also Linux), so I am not sure whether it's a bug or not. Do
> someone meet the same scene?
> PS:The Fedora is running on the Sun VirtualBox.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/f92ca56c/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:51:44 -0400
> From: Jason <monty19 at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Audio in virtual machines
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <BAY125-DAV13057040D58716CC332935A6780 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Has anyone been able to get audio working in a fully updated Fedora 11
> Beta virtual machine guest?
>
> I have tried on vmware server 2.0 (win vista and rhel 5.3 hosts), vmware
> fusion 2.0.4 (10.5 host), virtualbox 2.2.0, and parallels desktop 4.0.
>
> The furthest I get working audio is doing a clean installation of a
> Fedora 11 Beta guest. As soon as the kernel and pulseaudio are updated
> everything stops working; sound skips and hangs... nothing works. Fully
> updating a system doesn't resolve the problem.
>
> I did file a bug in bugzilla regarding my experience with the vmware
> products, however it was closed... twice. I have since gone on to try
> virtualbox and parallels with similar results. I won't have a chance to
> try a kvm guest until tomorrow at the earliest.
>
> Simply updating pulseaudio on a cleanly installed F11 Beta system (i.e.
> yum -y update pulseaudio) doesn't seem enough to break the system,
> although doing an update of pulseaudio and the kernel does (yum -y
> update pulseaudio kernel)
>
> Either booting the original kernel, or removing pulseaudio fixes the
> playback however removing pulseaudio isn't really an option anymore
> because it breaks the new volume control applet, with the old gnome
> volume control applet deprecated, not to mention it is impossible to
> configure any audio options with the graphical tools at that point either.
>
> The bug I filed is here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494747
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:04:35 -0700
> From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R <caf at omen.com>
> Subject: Add/Remove Software no progress display
> To: Fedora Test List <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49E96D73.5090003 at omen.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Today's Rawhide installs but the add/remove software app
> no longer shows the progress of which files are being
> worked on.
>
> --
> Chuck Forsberg caf at omen.com www.omen.com 503-614-0430
> Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
> Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
> 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
> End of fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 101
> *************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090417/b126a3e7/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list