[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Verification of MODIFIED F12Alpha blocker bugs


Today's rawhide (2009-08-11) includes an updated anaconda-12.13-1.fc12
which contains several fixes.  

On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 19:35 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Hey folks,
> Quite a good bit of testing performed this past week against F-12-Alpha test compose [1]!  The F12Alpha blocker list still has 1 test blocker (bug#516304) preventing composition of an Alpha candidate.  The list also contains several MODIFIED bugs.  As we wait for the Alpha Candidate compose, I encourage testers to help verify fixes for MODIFIED [2] bugs on the F12Alpha list.  At the time of this message, the list [3] consists of:
> 499854 - ASSIGNED - filedescriptor out of range in select()
> 513879 - MODIFIED - Rawhide anaconda not using correct gtk theme
> 515091 - MODIFIED - rescue mode fails: not all arguments converted; open("/etc/mtab", ...
> 515410 - MODIFIED - f12 anaconda mouse was not initialized during installation on stage 2
> 515472 - MODIFIED - f12 alpha system can not reboot

The fix doesn't appear to resolve the problem.  Looks like Jesse is
testing as well and has moved this issue back to ASSIGNED.

> 515555 - MODIFIED - F-12-Alpha-TC - mkofboot doesn't return the proper exit code

No longer seeing the reported issue.

> 515564 - MODIFIED - Physical media installs fail - storage.errors.FSError: mountpoint does not exist
> 515905 - NEW - Boot F-12-Alpha CD using kickstart with nfs repository fails
> 516144 - MODIFIED - Anaconda installing kernel-smp.ppc - expecting kernel.ppc64 kernel

Same, this appears to be fixed.

> 516168 - MODIFIED - Traceback while initializing disks
> 516304 - NEW - Traceback at end of install
> There is a go/no_go meeting planned for Monday afternoon (EDT) to decide whether conditions are ready to proceed as planned with F-12-Alpha.  Having MODIFIED bugs verified helps reduce the number of unanswered questions going into that meeting.  Feel free to stop on by #fedora-qa to share your findings real time.
> Thanks for pitching in!
> James
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_12_Alpha_Install_Test_Results
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#MODIFIED
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=507676&hide_resolved=1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]