Fedora 13 Release Criteria--Final Feedback Needed by 2009-12-05

John Poelstra poelstra at redhat.com
Thu Dec 3 03:37:58 UTC 2009

On 12/02/2009 12:18 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:53 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Thank you to everyone who provided feedback to the first email and added
>> updates to the wiki and talk pages.  I've also gone through the emails
>> to make sure the points raised there were integrated.
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria
>> This is a last reminder to review the pages if you have not already.  We
>> will be discussing and resolving all of the outstanding items on the on
>> "Talk" tab for each wiki page during the FUDCon Hackfests on Sunday
>> (2009-12-06) with a collection of people from QA, Releng and Development.
> I still think point 12. is a misuse of 'critical path'.  Critical path
> packages are critical in so far as they must not break the critical path
> towards installation, boot and login. But that does not mean that the
> overloaded and overused term 'regression' should be used unqalified
> here.

Thanks for all your feedback in your previous post too!  I either made 
the changes or added it to a list of items to discuss at FUDCon.  In 
this case I added it to: 


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list