"yum update" fails on "libgpod.so.3()(64bit)" dependency
iarly selbir
iarlyy at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 15:33:25 UTC 2009
Since yesterday I'm having the same problem.
http://fpaste.org/paste/4643
Any idea of when this will be solved?
Regards,
- -
iarly selbir ( ski0s )
:wq!
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > Fresh install of f11 alpha on gateway MX7120 laptop, followed by yum
> update:
> >
> > ...
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > kipi-plugins-0.2.0-0.14.rc1.fc11.x86_64 from rawhide has depsolving
> problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: libgpod.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package
> > kipi-plugins-0.2.0-0.14.rc1.fc11.x86_64 (rawhide)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libgpod.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package
> > kipi-plugins-0.2.0-0.14.rc1.fc11.x86_64 (rawhide)
> > ...
> >
> > should i have expected that? should i just go do something else for a
> > while until that's resolved?
>
> Yeah, that's known. We updated libgpod to 0.7.0 last week and
> unfortunately kipi-plugins has some build issues with other parts of
> rawhide and wasn't able to be rebuilt for the new libgpod. Rex knows
> about it and I am sure will get it built as soon as possible (in
> between all the other KDE builds he and the relatively small KDE
> somehow manage to handle :).
>
> --
> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp<http://www.pobox.com/%7Etmz/pgp>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Everyone needs to believe in something. I believe I'll have another
> beer.
>
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090227/2c00fd86/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list