Bug Triage Meeting continued

[iarly selbir]

An idea,

could have a list of all components, etc. .. is not given proper attention,
or that we are forgotten of to triage something.

A statistic that shows which components are being worked and what more are
being worked less.


tk009, thanks for your explain :D


Regards,

- -
iarly selbir ( ski0s )

:wq!


On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:00 AM, TK009 <john.brown009 at gmail.com> wrote:

> continuing the discussion from the last triage meeting ...
>
> The meeting recap and IRC transcript can be found here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Meetings/Minutes-2009-Feb-10
>
>
> adamw wrote as a follow on to the meeting recap-
>
>        "We really need ASAP a simple set of goals that can be easily and
> quickly
> measured (preferably by anyone)."
>
> I fully agree.
>
> I thought the goal of x number of bugs triaged may be to simplistic a goal
> for the veteran triagers, however no other specific and measurable
> alternative has been purposed that I am aware. I would like to hear from
> other triagers and anyone else that would like to provide input.
>
> Is committing to triage x number of bugs against targeted components on the
> new Core Component List [
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/components] a worthy goal for the
> triage team to set for themselves in the current development cycle?
>
> Will this goal achieve the meaningful, measurable and timely contribution
> the triage team want to have on F11?
>
> I think x number of bugs commitment is a worthy goal, and with the metric
> reports comphappy is creating, the team, the project and the community can
> keep informed of the progress in achieving those goals.
>
> My hope is that we can finalize this as our specific goal before the
> meeting Tuesday, so anyone with something they feel needs to be said please
> say it. Now is the time and this is the place. *looks at poelcat, jds2001,
> mcepl, john5342, comphappy, quantumburnz, affix, SMParrish, facmi,
> stickster, douda, TopoMorto*
>
> Adamw, brother someone must have erased your name from the active triagers
> list, I don't see it on there (hint, hint) =). And iarlyy, I see you
> lurking.
>
> This wont work without you, so please provide some feedback on this.
>
> Something I forgot to add to the meeting recap is comphappy's request to
> finalize the format and what data should be presented in the metrics
> reports.
>
> My idea's on this if I understand correctly
>
> display all time top ten triagers and # of bugs traiged
> display top 15 triagers for the week and month complete stats
> list of all triagers with complete stats
>
> again, please provide feedback on this.
>
> In response to adamw's follow up on Bug Triage Days-
>
> I have no experience with it, but thought it was a great idea. I read on
> poelcat's blog I think, about an experience he had with a bug triage day. It
> was uncoordinated and lacked focus or a real goal. A specific goal should be
> set for each triage day, giving those involved a sense focus with measurable
> achievement. Maybe poelcat will give up the link, he explained it much
> better.
>
> *grabs a chair and gets his balmer face on* Feedback! Feedback! Feedback!
>
> more to follow...
>
> Edward (TK009)
>
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090213/edd671d2/attachment.htm>