.fc9 packages and friends in Rawhide

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 17.02.2009 08:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> If you actually look at the list, few of them fit the description 'big
>> data package'. They're normal things like applications, libraries and X
>> drivers, which really should get rebuilt from cycle to cycle.
> There was no mass rebuild for Fedora 10, so packages were only rebuilt for
> F10 if they actually changed, or needed a rebuild for a new version of a
> dependency.

Which IMHO is a good thing.

> As for the packages which weren't rebuilt even for F9, they might have
> failed the rebuild for GCC 4.3.

Shouldn't the "Fails To Build From Source" effort ( 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS ) have catched (and removed) those 
in between?

CU
knurd