BugZappers

[John Poelstra]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:22 +0000, Lalit Dhiri wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>> From: awilliam at redhat.com
>>> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>>> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:02:04 -0800
>>> Subject: RE: BugZappers
>>>
>>> But, if you're still worried, by all means feel free not to sign it. If
>>> that's the case, I will take the matter up with the legal folks to see
>>> if we can remove the requirement for Bugzappers to sign the CLA.
>>> --
>> I think it's best to get a response from legal as I will not be signing the CLA.
> 
> OK, this has been fixed now. I talked to spot (part of the legal group)
> and he checked back and figured that fedorabugs requiring CLA signature
> is more or less a mistake. The requirement has now been removed.
> 
>>From now on, other admins please note :), people don't need to sign the
> CLA to join Bugzappers. I'll approve Lalit's membership now.
> 
> Thanks!

Fair enough.

The BugZappers didn't make this up on their own.  It was reviewed by 
FESCo (who was kind of neutral on the issue if I recall correctly) about 
a year ago at one of their meetings.

John