Rawhide: similar systems reports different operating system
Antonio M
antonio.montagnani at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 15:30:14 UTC 2009
2009/1/29 Tom London <selinux at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Antonio M <antonio.montagnani at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/1/29 Antonio M <antonio.montagnani at gmail.com>:
>>> 2009/1/29 Jerry Amundson <jamundso at gmail.com>:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Antonio M <antonio.montagnani at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I have two F11 systems with similar packages.
>>>>> On both I have
>>>>> fedora-release 10.91-1 Fedora release files
>>>>> fedora-release-notes 10.0.0-1 Release Notes for Fedora 10
>>>>> livna-release 1-1 rpm.livna.org repository files
>>>>> rpmfusion-free-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion (free) Repository Configuration
>>>>> rpmfusion-nonfree-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion (nonfree) Repository
>>>>> Configuration
>>>>>
>>>>> but Webmin reports one as:
>>>>> Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.90
>>>>> and the other as:
>>>>> Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.91
>>>>>
>>>>> Why???
>>>>
>>>> Do both report 10.91 at boot? (the progress text bar or graphic spinny thing)
>>>>
>>>> If so, then the webmin list is two doors down, on the left...
>>>>
>>>> jerry
>>>>
>>>
>>> jerry
>>>
>>> I forgot to check the progress bar, that reports 10.90 on one system.Why??
>>> I re-checked this morning and I have fedora-release-10.91-1.noarch installed.
>>> Funny....
>>>
>>> --
>>> Antonio Montagnani
>>> Skype : antoniomontag
>>>
>>
>> I cheched fedora-release in etc and it says: Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide)
>> Shall I file a bug???
>>
>
> Did you possibly install these packages in a different order on these systems?
>
> Perhaps check the install/update times in /var/log/yum.log .... ?
> Were they installed in different order (that is, 10.90 after 10.91-1)?
>
> tom
> --
> Tom London
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
I think that install 10.90 after 10.91 is not possible, unless
particular options.
Anyway, fedora-release in /etc reports
Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide)
So what is wrong???
--
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list