Fedora 10 Server Upgrade from Server 9

James J Catchpole james_j_catchpole at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 12 18:06:35 UTC 2009


I have been running Fedora 10 on my laptop
for some time and felt it was now safe enough
to migrate my server to Fedora 10 from Fedora 9.
My Fedora 9 System had three file systems, the
Logical Volume File System in ext3 and
two other HDD,s, one the normal IDE Drive on
the Server, the other an USB Drive; each was
formatted as a complete drive without partitions
as ext4. When I attempted to upgrade to Fedora
9 I realized I had forgotten to add the ext4 parameter
to the Kernel Boot Options; the result was that
both of the ext4 HDD file systems were destroyed.
I could not find a way to recover them so I lost
all of the data. This seems unacceptable to me;
if one fails to provide a needed parameter the
least that should happen is a warning message
asking the user to go back and specify the ext4
parameter; however, even if one does not do
so the file systems should not have been destroyed;
they should simply been inaccessible.

fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-test-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: encrypted f10 install - changed after using livecd - a
>       question? (Mike Cloaked)
>    2. Re: New kernel doesn't complete booting (Michal Jaegermann)
>    3. Re: encrypted f10 install - changed after using livecd - a
>       question? (Michal Jaegermann)
>    4. Re: New kernel doesn't complete booting (Mike Cloaked)
>    5. Re: New kernel doesn't complete booting (David)
>    6. rawhide report: 20090112 changes (Rawhide Report)
>    7. Re: New kernel doesn't complete booting (Christopher Beland)
>    8. Re: New kernel doesn't complete booting (Antonio M)
>    9. FC8 Yum update error (Damian Brasher)
>   10. Re: FC8 Yum update error (J?hann B. Gu?mundsson)
>   11. Re: FC8 Yum update error (seth vidal)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:19:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: encrypted f10 install - changed after using livecd - a
> 	question?
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <21401571.post at talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
> Mike Cloaked wrote:
>   
>> Yes I intend to do so - probably in the next day or so when I feel less
>> angry!
>>
>>     
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479579
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090112/f5e1468c/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list