On 07/07/2009 10:32 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >> I'm sure I missed a notification somewhere, but am wondering why the >> rawhide report no longer shows broken dependencies? >> > > maybe there are none? :) > > -sv > Cute. I was ready to acknowledge that there none. :-)