Updated Schedule for F12

[James Laska]

On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:45 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> James Laska said the following on 07/10/2009 11:43 AM Pacific Time:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:12 +0000, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 17:00 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >>> o Added earlier blocker review days (f13)
> >>> o Changed usage of "Release Candidate"  (f13)
> >>> o Fixed dates for Beta phase so that "to" and "from" dates are
> >>> correct 
> >>> in the context of the report (notting)
> >>>
> >>> http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html
> >>>
> >>> Hopefully this version is a good starting point for the meeting f13
> >>> said 
> >>> he would arrange with QA at Monday's meeting.
> >>>
> >> Hrm, something is still missing.  Here is the feedback that I gave
> >> James.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Blocker Reviews) we need a blocker review day to happen with enough time
> >> for maintainers to react and fix things prior to the freeze.  I see
> >> there are ones scheduled for the 17th, 24th, and 31st, with the freeze
> >> being Aug 4th.  This is good, but is there a good reason to have 3
> >> before the freeze, rather than 2?  Just curious.  Also curious (and
> >> forgetful) what the reason is we are doing these on Fridays.  What's
> >> missing here is a review of the blocker bugs just before the RC compose
> >> (is this implicit?) as well as one /after/ the RC compose and testing.
> > 
> > All good points.  I'm not too worried about the number.  I think our
> > intent is in the right place to address the issues we had during F11;
> > more blocker bug days, and earlier.  
> > 
> 
> <full cut>
> 
> Trying to consume all of these emails and know which changes to make or 
> not make is more than my little brain can handle :)  I really do want to 
> understand the methodology and nuance so I can template the tasks correctly.
> 
> Can we meet at 1 PM EDT/10 AM PDT tomorrow (Monday) using Fedora Talk 
> and Gobby?  Fedora Talk extension: 2009.  This should work well 
> (hopefully) because the releng meeting is at 2 PM EDT (or at least it 
> was last week).

Sorry for late response.  1pm EDT (17:00 UTC) works for me.  See
everyone then.

Thanks,
James

> I will put a full text version of detailed schedule on Gobby and we can 
> start at the top and run it all the way through to the bottom.  This 
> will be much faster for me and hopefully for everyone else too.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090713/8f70add9/attachment.sig>