um ... what's with the "." after the directory perms?
Patrick O'Callaghan
pocallaghan at gmail.com
Tue Mar 3 18:22:43 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:33 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "RPJD" == Robert P J Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> writes:
>
> RPJD> drwxr-xr-x. ^ ????
> RPJD> what's that period? i've never seen that before. or have i
> RPJD> just not been paying attention?
>
> >From "info ls":
>
> Following the file mode bits is a single character that specifies
> whether an alternate access method such as an access control list
> applies to the file. When the character following the file mode
> bits is a space, there is no alternate access method. When it is
> a printing character, then there is such a method.
>
> GNU `ls' uses a `.' character to indicate a file with an SELinux
> security context, but no other alternate access method.
>
> A file with any other combination of alternate access methods is
> marked with a `+' character.
I missed that because it's different in the F10 version of ls:
Following the file mode bits is a single character that
specifies
whether an alternate access method such as an access control list
applies to the file. When the character following the file mode
bits is a space, there is no alternate access method. When it is
a printing character, then there is such a method.
For a file with an extended access control list, a `+' character is
listed. Basic access control lists are equivalent to the
permissions listed, and are not considered an alternate access
method.
poc
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list