BugZappers wiki cleanup - comments and questions

[TK009]

John Poelstra wrote:
> TK009 said the following on 03/06/2009 08:10 AM Pacific Time:
>> John Poelstra wrote:
>>> TK009 wrote:
>>>> My understanding has been that yes you can triage components that 
>>>> someone else has chosen.  For greatest triage impact it would be 
>>>> best to choose components not already chosen, however, triage 
>>>> components you feel most comfortable with.
>>>>
>>>> This may change after the meeting Tuesday. I believe this is the 
>>>> correct answer for now though. I know you've asked this question a 
>>>> number of times now and not really received an answer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I changed the admonition on the joining page.
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Joining#How_to_Sign_Up
>>>
>>> Is that better?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>> I think it was the conflicting wording
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/ActiveTriagers
>> the note above the components list says:
>> "*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component"
>> *
>> while 
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Joining#How_to_Sign_Up says:
>> *"If you are unfamiliar with a component and someone is very active 
>> there, it is probably a good idea to pick a different component or 
>> talk to that person and see if you can work together."
>>
>> *TK009*
>> *
>>
>
> How about if we remove "*It is okay for more than one person to cover 
> the same component" for now ?
>
> John
>
We need to remove one of them for sure. I see no issue with removing 
"*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component". I 
have one question though, does the *"If you are unfamiliar with a 
component and someone is very active there, it is probably a good idea 
to pick a different component or talk to that person and see if you can 
work together." fit best where it is or would it better in place of the 
"*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component"?