network manager, KDE and libudev
John Summerfield
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Tue Mar 17 23:54:57 UTC 2009
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 07:50 +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
>> Solves a different problem. Seems sensible, to me, that when a new
>> release is installed then the repo for that release should be enabled.
>> However, there may be other customisations that should be retained (eg
>> specifications of a local mirror).
>
> Our current tool set does not have any merging capability of changed
> config files. Its an all or nothing approach. The repo files shipped
> in the fedora-release package for a given release will have the correct
> repos enabled (the fedora repo as well as the updates repo), but if
> you've locally modified your repo files, we won't overwrite your changes
> and instead write out .rpmnew files for you to examine and merge as
> appropriate.
>
>
That is why I suggested yum be enhanced to add the capability of
changing this flag,
It would allow the appropriate repos to be enabled, maybe by the
<distro>-release package, without disturbing other customisations.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list