Bug workflow page revised

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Wed May 6 17:27:59 UTC 2009

Hi, guys.

I just got a bit inspired by a QA meeting discussion, and have made
substantial revisions to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow . It should
now be a lot more comprehensive and informative about the whole Fedora
cycle (and it's also in the right order!)

I know we considered it substantially a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html , but I had second
thoughts about that. That page doesn't cover the process exactly, more
just describes the fields. It also really is mostly about RHEL, and I
think trying to talk about the rather different RHEL and Fedora
processes in one page would get very confusing.

So I'm now thinking that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow should be
the official reference point for Fedora, and we can ask for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html page to say at the
top that it talks about RHEL, and direct you to the Wiki page for the
Fedora system.

Does this sound sensible? Do my changes to the Wiki page look good to

Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list