F11 updates vs. rawhide

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed May 13 16:33:28 UTC 2009

On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:34:42 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On 05/11/2009 05:28 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > That makes perfect sense, what could be better than to release a
> > bunch of packages for which there are known bug fixes, then
> > everyone can install the release and spend the effort and bandwidth
> > to upgrade to install the bug fixes later, one machine at a time
> > instead of from the install DVD.
> You should read
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy
> If it is just bug fixes and has a low risk of destabilization, then
> the package maintainers are free to file a freeze exception and
> rel-eng can tag it to go into Fedora 11 directly instead of into the
> updates repository.

Well, if thats so, the confusing thing to me is: 

"Release blocking bugs can still be fixed following the policy below."

Implying that only release blocking bugs should be using that
procedure. Should that sentence be removed? 

> Rahul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090513/232e21ea/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list