Revised draft of priority / severity mail to -devel list

Mani A a.mani.cms at gmail.com
Thu May 14 21:45:47 UTC 2009


On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> We have a draft convention for how these fields should be set here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Beland/Bugzilla_Legend#Severity_and_Priority .
> As you can see, it basically suggests that the severity field be used
> to rate the importance of the issue in the context only of the
> affected package, and priority be used to rate the importance of the
> issue in the context of the distribution as a whole.


With respect to what type of user?

The proposal has a big problem there.

Consider https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492005 for example

It is marked as a low priority bug of medium severity.

That does not seem correct for newbie users


A better way of specifying would be to have a third field for 'lowest
target user group'


Best

A. Mani


-- 
A. Mani
ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://amani.topcities.com




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list