[WAAAAAY OT] can't build openembedded/angstrom on f11

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Sun May 31 20:45:03 UTC 2009


On Sun, 31 May 2009, Robert L Cochran wrote:

> Maybe I'll even buy a Beagleboard. This took several hours to do,
> all day on my Dell Latitude E6400 laptop in fact, but it seems to
> have worked.
>
> Results under Fedora 11, meaning this version exactly
>
> [rlc at deafeng3 openembedded]$ uname -a
> Linux deafeng3.signtype.info 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 27
> 17:27:08 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [rlc at deafeng3 openembedded]$ cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
>
>
> [From `bitbake base-image`:]
>
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2946 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun
> and 0 failed.
> NOTE: build 200905310908: completed
> [rlc at deafeng3 openembedded]$ bitbake console-image
> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: - (6650/6650) [100 %]
> NOTE: Parsing finished. 6368 cached, 0 parsed, 282 skipped, 0 masked.
> NOTE: Cache is clean, not saving.
> NOTE: build 200905311345: started
> .....
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2928 tasks of which 2890 didn't need to be
> rerun and 0 failed.
> NOTE: build 200905311345: completed
>
> [rlc at deafeng3 openembedded]$ bitbake x11-image
> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: - (6650/6650) [100 %]
> NOTE: Parsing finished. 6368 cached, 0 parsed, 282 skipped, 0 masked.
> NOTE: Cache is clean, not saving.
> NOTE: build 200905311351: started
>
> OE Build Configuration:
> BB_VERSION = "1.8.12"
> METADATA_BRANCH = "stable/2009"
> METADATA_REVISION = "901e7c5b47b9f3695cef841e6c8663d37c932fec"
> TARGET_ARCH = "arm"
> TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi"
> MACHINE = "beagleboard"
> DISTRO = "angstrom"
> DISTRO_VERSION = "2009.X-test-20090531"
> TARGET_FPU = "hard"
>
> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> NOTE: preferred version git of u-boot not available (for item u-boot)
> NOTE: preferred version git of u-boot not available (for item u-boot)
> ....
> ....
> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 6096 tasks of which 2908 didn't need to be
> rerun and 0 failed.
> NOTE: build 200905311351: completed

  please tell me you had the glibc-static package installed, cuz if
you didn't, then i'm going to be confused again.  at the moment,
mine's still building but i'm past the point where it was failing
before because of that issue.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list