right place for comments on fedora moblin remix?
awilliam at redhat.com
Sat Nov 7 18:06:06 UTC 2009
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 05:21 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > I believe the appropriate action at this point is to debug your
> > xpress 200m. With fire, and possibly a big stick with rusty nails in
> > it.
> chances are good that's true. what's curious, however, is that
> *some* distros (debian, suse) work just fine with that video chip.
> fedora, though ... nothing but grief. go figure.
Probably different X server / driver versions and config options. What
seems consistent is that _some_ 200ms wind up not working with just
about any X release. it just seems to be a particularly fragile chip for
> > (seriously - what date remix did you try? it'll presumably be using
> > the same X packages as every other spin/mix, so if you got one from
> > yesterday you might have been bitten by the X server horkage, I
> > guess.)
> i downloaded it maybe three days ago:
> and the fedora moblin page itself:
> suggests issues should be posted here or to the fedora-devel list. is
> there an even newer spin i can test?
I'm not sure if they're doing daily spins :/ I also don't know what
versions of the X stuff wound up on their Beta 2 image. Peter Robinson,
could you let us know? What kernel and xorg-x11-server versions are on
the beta2 build?
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the fedora-test-list