Fedora 12 RC-3
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 16:29:17 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:17 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2009 10:40:13 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 16:04:40 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:38:56 Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:22 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > > > On two system ... regular bare metal and a laptop. Do you wnat them
> > > > > here or should I open a BZ report?
> > > >
> > > > BZ is fine, please post the number here though.
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533740
> > >
> > > Includes yum.log files and a copy of the screenshot
> > Tested RC4 and it now works ... BZ report closed.
> As I was thinking about it, I notice that the list of optional additional
> repositories now includes not just updates but updates-testing. This differs
> from F11 where only the everything base and updates was listed.
> Was this intentional?
> Personally, I think this may be a good idea. However, will it cause problems
> for some users who are not prepared to deal with software not completely
It's unintended and different from F11 behaviour, but Jesse couldn't fix
it safely (fixing it so this repo set gets displayed is a small and safe
change, but fixing it not to show updates-testing is bigger, AIUI). We
decided it was acceptable.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the fedora-test-list