Fedora 12 RC-3
Lawrence E Graves
lgraves at risingstarmbc.com
Mon Nov 9 17:28:28 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:29 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:17 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > On Monday 09 November 2009 10:40:13 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 16:04:40 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:38:56 Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:22 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > > > > On two system ... regular bare metal and a laptop. Do you wnat them
> > > > > > here or should I open a BZ report?
> > > > >
> > > > > BZ is fine, please post the number here though.
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533740
> > > >
> > > > Includes yum.log files and a copy of the screenshot
> > >
> > > Tested RC4 and it now works ... BZ report closed.
> > As I was thinking about it, I notice that the list of optional additional
> > repositories now includes not just updates but updates-testing. This differs
> > from F11 where only the everything base and updates was listed.
> > Was this intentional?
> > Personally, I think this may be a good idea. However, will it cause problems
> > for some users who are not prepared to deal with software not completely
> > tested?
> It's unintended and different from F11 behaviour, but Jesse couldn't fix
> it safely (fixing it so this repo set gets displayed is a small and safe
> change, but fixing it not to show updates-testing is bigger, AIUI). We
> decided it was acceptable.
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
Just installed RC-4 64-bit and everything is working fine except of
kmod-nvidia drivers for the new kernel. Not your problems. Waiting
patiently on rpmfusion to release.
Lawrence E Graves <lgraves at risingstarmbc.com>
More information about the fedora-test-list