Fedora 12 RC-3

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 16:29:17 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:17 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2009 10:40:13 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 16:04:40 Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:38:56 Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:22 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > > > > On two system ... regular bare metal and a laptop.  Do you wnat them
> > > > > here or should I open a BZ report?
> > > >
> > > > BZ is fine, please post the number here though.
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533740
> > >
> > > Includes yum.log files and a copy of the screenshot
> > 
> > Tested RC4 and it now works ... BZ report closed.
> 
> As I was thinking about it, I notice that the list of optional additional 
> repositories now includes not just updates but updates-testing.  This differs 
> from F11 where only the everything base and updates was listed.

Yup.

> Was this intentional?

Nope.

> Personally, I think this may be a good idea.  However, will it cause problems 
> for some users who are not prepared to deal with software not completely 
> tested?

It's unintended and different from F11 behaviour, but Jesse couldn't fix
it safely (fixing it so this repo set gets displayed is a small and safe
change, but fixing it not to show updates-testing is bigger, AIUI). We
decided it was acceptable.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list