wlan0: disassociating by local choice (reason=3)

Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 6 20:14:40 UTC 2009


Dear all,

Every time I try to connect to internet via wireless, I get the message on the title.   I want to update but can't I have to switch to wired connection to actually get the updates.  Since I do not know against which component to file a bug against, I want to ask for advice.  I saw the following running a dmesg:

CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
 domain 0: span 0-1 level SIBLING
  groups: 0 1
CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
 domain 0: span 0-1 level SIBLING
  groups: 1 0
type=1400 audit(1254839778.329:7): avc:  denied  { search } for  pid=1495 comm="polkitd" name="root" dev=dm-0 ino=277 scontext=system_u:system_r:policykit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0 tclass=dir
fuse init (API version 7.12)
SELinux: initialized (dev fuse, type fuse), uses genfs_contexts
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Up<100 Mbps Full Duplex>
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:816 check_unmap+0x38e/0x578() (Not tainted)
Hardware name: Aspire one      
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA memory with wrong function [device address=0x000000002fd09062] [size=90 bytes] [mapped as single] [unmapped as page]
Modules linked in: fuse nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss exportfs sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_multipath uinput arc4 snd_hda_codec_realtek ecb snd_hda_intel ath5k snd_hda_codec mac80211 uvcvideo ath videodev snd_hwdep v4l1_compat cfg80211 iTCO_wdt snd_pcm iTCO_vendor_support i2c_i801 snd_timer rfkill atl1e joydev wmi snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video output [last unloaded: microcode]
Pid: 1241, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686 #1
Call Trace:
 [<c0444a9d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7b/0xa3
 [<c060c224>] ? check_unmap+0x38e/0x578
 [<c0444b2e>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x48
 [<c060c224>] check_unmap+0x38e/0x578
 [<c060c5b4>] debug_dma_unmap_page+0x62/0x7b
 [<f895911f>] pci_unmap_page.clone.3+0x53/0x6e [atl1e]
 [<f895a065>] atl1e_intr+0x2e0/0x3b6 [atl1e]
 [<c049a8c3>] ? handle_edge_irq+0xb3/0x111
 [<c0498b96>] handle_IRQ_event+0x56/0x112
 [<c049a8cc>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0x111
 [<c0405fa4>] handle_irq+0x50/0x6c
 [<c04056c5>] do_IRQ+0x52/0xb7
 [<c0404095>] common_interrupt+0x35/0x3c
---[ end trace 3e32d8d7ae6c62fe ]---
Mapped at:
 [<c060c91f>] debug_dma_map_page+0x6b/0x13b
 [<f89587fc>] pci_map_single.clone.2+0x72/0x8d [atl1e]
 [<f8958e39>] atl1e_xmit_frame+0x622/0x8b5 [atl1e]
 [<c0787e6d>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x230/0x2c9
 [<c079a122>] __qdisc_run+0xd6/0x1cb
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Down
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Up<100 Mbps Full Duplex>
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Down
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Up<100 Mbps Full Duplex>
ATL1E 0000:03:00.0: ATL1E: eth0 NIC Link is Down
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0 (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=217)
wlan0: associated
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready

wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0 (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=220)
wlan0: associated
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
wlan0: disassociating by local choice (reason=3)
wlan0: deauthenticated (Reason: 2)
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: authenticated
wlan0: associate with AP 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0
wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:1c:58:05:e7:a0 (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=221)
wlan0: associated

Should I file against NetworkManager and let the maintainers of that package figure it out?

I am running wireless on another laptop and I have not encountered this problem.  Thanks in advance for advice/suggestions.  

Regards,

Antonio


      




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list