F12-Beta-i686-Live-Edu.iso has selinux problem with sugar browse

[Thomas C Gilliard]

F12-Beta-i686-Live-Edu.iso has 2 problems:

1.) selinux policy has to be set to selenix=0 for sugar browse to work 
using these methods
    a.) <esc> <tab> selinux=0 at boot screen
    b.) changing selinux policy in gnome first then logging into sugar
2.) logging out of sugar and back into gnome. Sugar mouse cursor is 
retained in gnome desktop.

selinux policy should be changed to allow sugar activities to work.

fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-test-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: f12, alpha versus beta? (Jesse Keating)
>    2. Re: f12, alpha versus beta - how to tell ? (Jesse Keating)
>    3. Re: f12, alpha versus beta - how to tell ? (Robert P. J. Day)
>    4. Re: f12, alpha versus beta? (Robert P. J. Day)
>    5. rawhide report: 20091017 changes (Rawhide Report)
>    6. Re: f12, alpha versus beta? (Patrick O'Callaghan)
>    7. Re: f12, alpha versus beta? (Clyde E. Kunkel)
>    8. Re: f12, alpha versus beta - how to tell ? (Bruno Wolff III)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:55:38 -0700
> From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: f12, alpha versus beta?
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1255766138.25237.1.camel at localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:00 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   
>>   a valid philosophy but the linux kernel sees it differently, so it's
>> not like there's just one true way, but how fedora chooses to do this
>> is perfectly valid, thanks. 
>>     
>
> If we were dealing with just a distribution of source, it could be
> different.  But since we have to compile that source, and then compile
> those compiles into a binary install tree, there are lots of chances for
> things to go wrong, and so we test what will go out the door, rather
> than what we hope will be the same in the future if we do another
> compose.
>
> I've always taken offense to the term "release candidate" when there is
> no possible way the candidate could ever be released as is.
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20091017/75c3aa2d/attachment.htm>