[Fedora Update] [comment] xmms-1.2.11-7.20071117cvs.fc11

[Adam Jackson]

On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 00:12 -0500, Allen Kistler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:36:50 +0200, Vedran wrote:
> > 
> >> But why do we even still support xmms at all?
> > 
> > Because it still has some users? Because its users don't like other players,
> > such as the several that started as forks of XMMS? The development of
> > some of those other players even causes regression and new problems.
> 
> I use xmms.  It's small and simple.  I'm glad it's maintained.
> Now if only LP would bring back gnome-cd ...

atropine:~% yum info xmms audacious | egrep '(Name|Size)'
Name       : audacious
Size       : 660 k
Name       : xmms
Size       : 857 k

Which doesn't count the copy of gtk1 you have to bring in just for xmms'
sake.  So if small is _actually_ your metric...

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090924/29fefff3/attachment.sig>