Can a triager consider to set CLOSED NEXTRELEASE?

[Karel Volný]

Dne Čt 24. září 2009 16:57:04 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:19 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > ok, thanks for the clarification
> >
> > btw,
> >
> > "The resolutions CANTFIX, WONTFIX, and WORKSFORME are for
> > use by maintainers only, and *are self-explanatory*."
> >
> > - oh my ...
> 
> well, I should probably explain the release versioning wrinkle
>  there, yeah. But what they _mean_ is pretty self-explanatory.
>  'Can't fix', 'Won't fix', 'Works for me'. What's not to get?
>  :)

the part we already discussed: wontfix = I'll fix it, but not 
backport the fix

(sorry if I broke the policy in the past because of my ignorance)

K.

-- 
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol at jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090925/587f0208/attachment.sig>