status-page

[Sarah Wang]

Hi Csaba,

The package names on the statuspage are the names of POT files instead 
of CVS module names - by theory the POT name should be the same as the 
module/directory name, but unfortunately it is not the case. The reason 
is a historical one. Most of the configuration tools were called 
redhat-config-something previously. They have been changed to 
system-config-something - only the POT name has been changed not the CVS 
directory name. The only exception is specspo module - the POT file is 
called dist.pot.

Yes I agree with you that it would make a lot of sense to have 
consistent names across status page and CVS repository.

Sarah


Szigetvári Csaba wrote:

>I noticed a difference in the naming of modules between the statuspage and
>the CVS repository.
>
>It is not very difficult to find out how the modulenames are related, but
>wouldn't it make sense to use exactly the same names on the statuspage as in
>CVS?
>
>Regards,
>Csaba
>
>
>
>--
>Fedora-trans-list mailing list
>Fedora-trans-list at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>  
>