Modules missing in i18n.redhat.com

Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan sharuzzaman at myrealbox.com
Mon Jul 23 16:55:06 UTC 2007


Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> O/H Igor Pires Soares έγραψε:
>> I suspected the modules were moved to fedoraproject.org, but I thought
>> they would have kind a copy in i18n.redhat.com while the migration is
>> not totally finished, in order to we continue the translation how it
>> was.
>>
>> Anyway, I think it is a good solution to upload them to
>> cvs.fedoraproject.org. Otherwise we will have to translate the files and
>> keep them on our machines until transifex is ready, because it is not
>> viable to contact the maintainers to actually commit every translation,
>> not for the them and not for us.
> 
> The reason the move was done early was that we wanted to make it early enough in
> the release cycle of Fedora 8 (before test1), to give maintainers the time
> needed to resolve problems.
> 
> As far as transifex is concerned, the coding of the security layer could take
> from 2 days to 7. Let's hope that we'll have it before July 31; I'll be away for
> 10 days then. I should notice that transifex is *still* considered an experiment
> and could be decided not to use it. But the truth is that everything shows that
> we'll be OK using it, at least internally for Fedora only.
> 
> Temporarily hosting PO files on cvs.fpo is a solution. Someone will need to
> contact the maintainers though and let them now, actually commit the files and
> update a wiki page about it, and letting Infra know about it so that they'll
> tweak ACLs to allow maintainers to write on our repo.
> 
> -d
> 
> 

So, when is the earliest we can have access to the new CVS? Any info on 
that?

-- 
-----
Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan


---AV & Spam Filtering by M+Guardian - Risk Free Email (TM)---




More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list