Modules missing in i18n.redhat.com

[Magnus Larsson]

So different project use different VCS? And you have to have an account on
each of them OR use Transifex (which is in "early stage"...)? Is this
correct?


On 7/27/07, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 23:51 -0400, Magnus Larsson wrote:
> > I like the new translation pages. That's an improvement.
> >
> > Not sure I understand, but it looks like the translations are now
> > stored in 9 different repositories using 3 different version control
> > systems?
> > Is this going to change or?
> > (I would prefer using one version control system pointing to one
> > repository....)
>
> To goal of Transifex (that Dimitris is working on) is to make it not
> matter which VCS a module is in.  All the translation can be done
> through translate.fp.org.  Including any upstream/outside project that
> wants to be hooked in.
>
> We continue to use CVS as the main VCS for Fedora, but some projects
> wanted to use a new/different VCS.  Transifex makes it possible to
> translate for those projects _without_ using the native VCS tools (hg,
> git, svn, cvs).  If you prefer to interact directly with the VCS and
> have an account, you can do that as well.
>
> - Karsten
> --
>    Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project
> Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
>    quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
> ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
> --
> Fedora-trans-list mailing list
> Fedora-trans-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/attachments/20070730/b871d9ef/attachment.htm>