cvsl10n vs cvsdocs

Bart Couvreur couf at skynet.be
Sun Nov 25 17:36:47 UTC 2007


Hi all,

As a lot of you know, we as translators have access to the documentation
cvs.

Now, a lot of translators are member of cvsdocs. But you maybe not need
that: if you're not working on the original docs, you don't need that.
Having cvsl10n group membership is enough: you get all access to /po
directories and files.

So should we revoke everyone just translating from cvsdocs and add them
to cvsl10n (if you're not in there yet).

Thoughts, suggestions?

Bart
-- 
Bart <couf at fedoraproject.org> <couf at skynet.be>
key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D  3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/attachments/20071125/f9950b24/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list